For decades there seemed to be just one single dependable solution to keep data on a computer – employing a hard drive (HDD). However, this sort of technology is currently expressing it’s age – hard disk drives are noisy and sluggish; they’re power–hungry and frequently produce quite a lot of warmth in the course of serious operations.

SSD drives, on the other hand, are really fast, use up a lesser amount of energy and they are much cooler. They furnish a whole new approach to file accessibility and storage and are years in front of HDDs when considering file read/write speed, I/O efficiency and then power effectivity. Observe how HDDs fare against the modern SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

SSD drives provide a brand new & progressive solution to data storage according to the utilization of electronic interfaces in lieu of any sort of moving parts and spinning disks. This innovative technology is quicker, allowing for a 0.1 millisecond data access time.

Image

HDD drives even now utilize the same basic data file access technology which was actually created in the 1950s. Though it has been noticeably advanced since that time, it’s slow compared with what SSDs are offering. HDD drives’ file access rate varies somewhere between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Because of the completely new significant data storage technique adopted by SSDs, they furnish swifter data access rates and speedier random I/O performance.

In the course of our trials, all of the SSDs demonstrated their capability to deal with at least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Throughout the same tests, the HDD drives demonstrated that they are significantly slower, with only 400 IO operations managed per second. Although this might appear to be a good deal, for those who have a hectic server that serves many famous web sites, a slow hard disk drive can cause slow–loading web sites.

3. Reliability

Image

The absence of moving parts and rotating disks within SSD drives, and also the current improvements in electronic interface technology have resulted in a substantially less risky data file storage device, with a common failure rate of 0.5%.

Image

Since we have mentioned, HDD drives rely upon rotating hard disks. And anything that uses lots of moving components for extented amounts of time is at risk from failing.

HDD drives’ common rate of failure varies between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives operate almost noiselessly; they don’t produce surplus heat; they don’t call for added cooling alternatives and then take in a lot less power.

Tests have established the average electricity utilization of an SSD drive is between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

From the moment they have been constructed, HDDs have been quite electric power–heavy equipment. Then when you’ve got a server with many different HDD drives, this will certainly boost the monthly utility bill.

Typically, HDDs take in in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

The faster the data accessibility speed is, the sooner the data file requests are going to be processed. This means that the CPU will not have to save allocations waiting around for the SSD to reply back.

The normal I/O wait for SSD drives is barely 1%.

Image

HDD drives support sluggish accessibility rates in comparison to SSDs do, resulting for the CPU being forced to delay, while arranging resources for the HDD to discover and return the inquired data file.

The standard I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In the real world, SSDs carry out as perfectly as they did for the duration of our trials. We produced a full platform back–up on one of the production machines. During the backup operation, the normal service time for I/O demands was below 20 ms.

Image

With the exact same web server, however this time furnished with HDDs, the results were different. The regular service time for any I/O request fluctuated in between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Talking about back ups and SSDs – we’ve detected a significant enhancement in the data backup speed as we switched to SSDs. Now, a regular web server back up requires simply 6 hours.

Image

Alternatively, on a server with HDD drives, the same back–up could take three or four times as long to finish. A complete backup of an HDD–powered hosting server usually takes 20 to 24 hours.

To be able to instantaneously boost the effectiveness of your respective websites and never having to transform just about any code, an SSD–operated web hosting solution is a really good choice. Check our Linux shared hosting packages – our services have extremely fast SSD drives and are available at good prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is configured for you totally free. 99.9% network uptime. Full root server access.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Preview the instruments and features offered by our Virtual Private Servers. You can start with a smaller VPS Web Hosting server and upgrade with only a mouse click as your requirements grow.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Contact us around the clock by email or by employing our super–fast ticketing platform. Our technicians are prepared to respond to any queries within just 60 mins.